Market regulation will not work, the local government in the original title: psychological market regulation work of converting the local government. Author: psychological prices in August data released by the National Bureau of statistics confirms Zhu Haibin Chinese sustained high prices. 70 large and medium cities new commercial housing prices rose month on month growth of 1.3%, is a new high since the release of the data in 2011. First tier cities, the north of Guangzhou Shenzhen monthly price growth rate rebounded to 3.6%, respectively, 4.4%, 2.4% and. While some second tier cities, prices rose more ferocious, Zhengzhou to 5.5% monthly growth rate in August, Xiamen and Hefei over the past 12 months, the cumulative increase in house prices are more than 40%, exceeding the previous leading Shenzhen. Let buyers worried that soaring prices at the same time, hard to find a room, a case report is not about the sun, new housing yaohao. Accession to the property market regulation in the city to increase. Following the first-tier cities and some second tier city (Suzhou, Xiamen) after the mid September, Zhengzhou announced nine market regulation measures to control land price as the core, Hangzhou restarted on non permanent sources of restriction measures. So, these measures will be effective? I’m afraid it’s hard. In accordance with the previous history of the same regulation of the property market, the policy is currently published in the presence of two fundamental problems. A local government reflects the psychological. The experience of the past few years again, although the property market bubble caused problems, but from the real estate market steady growth is also difficult. The local government mentality for the real estate market, causing them to hate in a dilemma, it is difficult for the property market resorted to heavy handed. Overall, this round of market regulation in addition to the purchase of credit limit the most expensive land "three, and no substantive measures, and these measures are also relatively limited. In Hangzhou, for example, the purchase is limited to the central area and only for a set of (including) more than the housing non domicile. Two is in the property market regulation policy, especially the land supply policy repeatability error. Taking Beijing and Shanghai as an example, the first seven months of this year land transaction area over the same period last year fell by 56% and 48% respectively, while the sale of inventory has dropped to seven months. To curb the real estate bubble, so that the healthy development of the property market, the need for multi pronged approach, including land supply system, land fiscal policy, prudent regulatory measures, the tax system and the protection of all aspects of the housing mechanism. First, the supply of land should be established across the land supply targets. Given a second tier cities and three or four cities in the population mobility, real estate supply and demand of major differences, should establish a cross regional land allocation mechanism. Rigid land allocation mechanism, leading to the supply of land into a vicious spiral, that house prices rose in the area to increase the supply of land prices fell powerless, and the poor area government land, more land is poorer. Can be taken into account the establishment of cross regional transfer of land market indicators, from the high prices of urban residents to purchase or replacement of urban land indicators. The current land finance, there has been lax supervision, the term mismatch (corresponding to the long-term use of land leasing land transfer of short-term) and other issues. In addition to Wei相关的主题文章: